And just this year, 2015, the Justice Department announced its intention to carefully watch the activities of all Americans and their bank accounts by suggesting banks report anyone withdrawing at least $5000. But most of its provisions returned in the Patriot Act. Paul went on to say, “Not only will ‘unusual’ deposits into your account trigger suspicion, but so too might large cash withdrawals.” Privacy advocates were able to officially stop the Know Your Customer scheme. After that, any account activity that deviates from the profile will be considered suspicious behavior.” This information will be gathered over the first few months of the account’s creation. The profile will include such information as their credit history and other standard financial reviews, but will be expanded to include the customer’s deposit and withdrawal habits. A year before 9-11 more than 150,000 Americans protested these very provisions in a scheme by the FDIC called “Know Your Customer.” Congressman Ron Paul wrote of the Know Your Customer plan, “Under these regulations, banks will be required to first create a profile of all new and current customers. The Act requires fuller identification of bank customers. It doesn’t even require a real judge to obtain one anymore. If a warrant is obtained, you may never know about it. Under the Act, law enforcement can walk into your home and take records without your knowing they were there. The Patriot Act expands the capability to obtain warrants and conduct searches without disclosing them immediately. Instead, in many official circles it has come to mean those Americans who demand that the United States government adhere to the U.S. Just as predicted, that definition does not include Middle Eastern men connected with groups like Al-Qaeda or ISIS. And since its enactment, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has officially contracted with the Department of Homeland Security to create definitions of what and who constitute domestic terrorists. The Patriot Act changed the definition of terrorism, allowing even legitimate protestors, such as pro-life activists, to be at risk of being labeled “terrorists” if violence erupted at their events. The Act says that the government does not need to have a suspect or to even be conducting an investigation related to terrorism to monitor your visits into web sites on the Internet. In fact, then Congressman Ron Paul said he couldn’t even get a copy of the Act before the vote.Īs a result, provisions of the Act offered major opportunities for government abuses of law-abiding private citizens. However, the emotional rush to “do something” by quickly passing the Patriot Act, left little time for lawmakers to put its measures under scrutiny. When introduced, we were assured by the Justice Department that the Patriot Act was simply to give federal law enforcement agencies the surveillance and investigative tools they needed to deter future terror attacks. Of course the nation was scared and of course out went the cry – “Do something NOW to protect us.” This is the Patriot Act that was rushed into place just after a horrific terrorist attack – 911. The created hysteria over the Patriot Act being a guardian of our freedom is hog wash. #DOES THE PATRIOT ACT ABRIDGE ESSENTIAL FREEDOM FREE#He’s one of a very few to openly stand for the Constitutional rights of all Americans to be secure in their homes and free of government snooping into their private business. The fact is Rand Paul is a defender of American security unlike any other candidate currently running to lead this nation. Has anyone accused them of damaging American national security? So too have Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush. Newly announced presidential candidate Lindsey Graham is especially guilty of this let down in American security as he has pushed for policies to open our borders even further. Reportedly, Obama is allowing people from the same Middle Eastern nations that give rise to terrorism to flood into our nation at horrific rates. That fact now allows literally anyone who wants to harm our nation to cross over the border and to not only remain here, but also to receive tax payer benefits and perhaps even the right to vote. These accusations are almost humorous considering that many of these same establishment Republicans have refused to force Barack Obama to enforce immigration laws. Even Senator Paul, himself, said he was being accused of damaging America’s defenses against such attacks. The party line that is emerging says that we are now vulnerable to terrorist attack. Senator Rand Paul is taking a lot of heat from establishment Conservatives and some in the media for his unwavering stand against the Patriot Act.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |